Mastodon now works on Servo 👀 That def. wasn't the case as of like a week ago!
Weil sie das deutsche Schienennetz über Jahre sabotiert haben: CSU als linksextremistische Terrorgruppe eingestuft https://www.der-postillon.com/2025/09/scheuer-dobrindt-bande.html
"Do you think I reference dinosaurs too much when I write?" I asked.
She was silent, like the p in pterodactyl, but it said everything
The most radical act in tech isn’t building something new. It’s keeping the old ideals alive: that users should control their tools, not the other way around.
Linux admins when they have to use Windows: :/
Windows admins when they have to use Linux: :\
@fabos
Ja, das ist Schwyzerdütsch.
Es heißt eigentlich Müesli = kleines Mus. Propagiert von Max Bircher-Benner.
Müsli heißt Mäuslein.
see this is how i know the email is fake
linkedin banned me for posting about paws
Apparently this requires restating:
We should not want a European Palantir.
We should not want an open-source Palantir.
We should not want a non-commercial Palantir.
If it is supposed to do what Palantir does, we should not want it.
And I don't care to what extent Palantir's products are shaped by political or profit motives. We know enough to reject its logic altogether.
I am, oh so very tired of finding out that <BIG PERSON IN THE FOSS SPACE> is a transphobe and holds horribles views.
It's so exhausting, and honestly makes existing in this space as someone who is openly trans and queer kinda scary.
Especially when the common view is they want you to literally die
The early warning system at command center Serpukhov-15, loudly alerting of a nuclear attack from the United States, was of course modern and up-to-date. Stanislav Petrov was in charge, working his second shift in place of a colleague who was ill.
Many officers facing the same situation would have called their superiors to alert them of the need for a counter-attack. Especially as fellow officers were shouting at him to retaliate quickly before it was too late. Petrov did not succumb.
I've attached a short clip from a reenactment of the situation in the documentary The Man Who Saved the World.
The computer was indeed wrong about the imminent attack and Petrov likely saved the world from nuclear disaster in those impossibly stressful minutes, by daring to wait for ground confirmation. For context one must also be aware that this was at a time when US-Soviet relations were extremely tense.
I've previously written about three lessons to take away from Petrov's actions:
1. Embrace multiple perspectives
The fact that it was not Stanislov Petrov's own choice to pursue an army career speaks to me of how important it is to welcome a broad range of experiences and perspectives. Petrov received an education as an engineer rather than a military man. He knew the unpredictability of machine behavior.
2. Look for multiple confirmation points
Stanislav Petrov understood what he was looking for. While he has admitted he could not be 100% sure the attack wasn't real, there were several factors he has mentioned that played into his decision:
- He had been told a US attack would be all-out. An attack with only 5 missiles did not make sense to him.
- Ground radar failed to pick up supporting evidence of an attack, even after minutes of waiting.
- The message passed too quickly through the 30 layers of verification he himself had devised.
On top of this: The launch detection system was new (and hence he did not fully trust it).
3. Reward exposure of faulty systems
If we keep praising our tools for their excellence and efficiency it's hard to later accept their defects. When shortcomings are found, this needs to be communicated just as clearly and widely as successes. Maintaining an illusion of perfect, neutral and flawless systems will keep people from questioning the systems when the systems need to be questioned.
We need to stop punishing when failure helps us understand something that can be improved.
