pleroma.debian.social

pleroma.debian.social

Wouter Verhelst | @wouter@pleroma.debian.social

Debian Developer. husband. ex-FOSDEM organizer. Tennis lover. Amateur musician.

If it ain't fun, you're not doing it right.

@nazokiyoubinbou
No.

I don't subscribe to the idea that there is anything 'in' or 'out' of scope for anyone. You want to write something, and people want to use it? Great. Do that. We already have a scarcity of maintainers, let's not make it worse.

As long as the not-init-system parts can be disabled (and they can be), I see no problem with systemd providing a whole bunch of extra tools that work well with the rest of the system.
@waldi @veronica

@zaphodb
Yeah, fair.
@jpmens

@jpmens
Is it known what happened already? Last I checked they didn't know.

I have now officially passed #StarTrekAge.

#itsmybirthday #48

@nazokiyoubinbou
You can run systemd without systemd-resolved. I have done so ~forever.

The idea is that it makes certain things easier (e.g., having different DNS configs for different network interfaces), but the systemd developers know and understand that it isn't a valid thing everywhere.
@waldi @veronica

Choose the 'set debconf priority' option
Remember what the priority is set to currently.
Select 'low'. Congratulations, you're now in expert mode
Choose the 'set users and passwords' option.
You will now see a question whether you want to set a root PW. Choose not to.
Finish the 'set users and passwords' menu item
Go back to the 'set debconf priority' option.
Set the priority back to what it was.
You're not in expert mode anymore.
(2/2)
@veronica @Linux

@Linux
Sudo is enabled if you choose not to set the root password. This requires you to go into expert mode in the installer though, although you don't have to do the full install that way.

What I do:

Run the installer normally
When prompted to enter the root PW, use the 'back' button until you're in the main menu
(1/2)
@veronica

@k0bin
I do a lot of gaming on my Debian, all the time.
@veronica

the fediverse works best when you don't strive for "growth" or whatever and instead enjoy saying random bullshit with friends on the timeline

@foone
Real programmers make music on a dot matrix ๐Ÿ˜‰

https://youtu.be/pX4tBIwhOqY

Never let anyone try to talk you out of a quick half hour DIY project. Those three hours will be the best six days of your life.

@strypey
I agree with the message, but I read "masking" first as the type involving ffp2 etc things and so I was very confused when it started talking about autism ๐Ÿ˜‚
@autistics @ashiel

@mattskala
Oops, yes, that was a typo. Sorry.
@bkuhn @vagrantc @mjw

@mattskala
Oh no. That was discussed in a bug report that this thread links to, but that's a terrible idea.

This is about adding an *option* to ls to swap the symlink and what that points to around in the ls output.
@bkuhn @vagrantc @mjw

@mattskala
Anyone who tries to parse the ls output for symlink status rather than using https://manpages.debian.org/trixie/coreutils/stat.1.en.html (and doesn't do so in a shell with potential output-changing environment variables cleared) deserves for their scripts to be broken.

ls is an interactive program, its output should not be considered parseable.
@bkuhn @vagrantc @mjw

A single contact in my list which I have an empty chat with (not communicated in years) keeps sending "chat session refreshed" like no tomorrow. Two updates yesterday, roughly 200+ (yes, two hundred) in the last hour.

I blocked the contact, but am still receiving a plethora of "chat session refreshed"

Does this match any known attack patterns, or does anyone have another explanation?

I am wary of replying in case it's part of some attack pattern.

and reasonable speculation OK

@collinfunk
That bug fails to notice that it is using confusing language in the documentation.

ln TARGET LINK_NAME

the target can reasonably be assumed to be the file that is created. But in the case of ln, it's the target *of* the file that is created.

I think that is where my confusion stems from, and I think this language should be updated.

I can't quite think of a good replacement for TARGET, though.
@bkuhn @mjw

@bkuhn
Well it could be an option to ln, and I for one would love it and make it the default in mine.

Please submit that patch to coreutils upstream as non default behaviour. You can make it a per user default using environment variables and/or shell aliases.
@mjw @vagrantc

@foone
Ok, ok, I lie. These days there's 'emile', which is able to boot Linux without Mac OS on some m68k models. But not then. And I don't think Emile ever supported the Q950.

ยป