@mirabilos
No, it said macOS, which is what apple operating systems have been called since 2016 😉
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS
@vga256
No, it said macOS, which is what apple operating systems have been called since 2016 😉
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS
@vga256
@sam
ISO does just sell their standards. Everyone has access provided they open their wallet. I did that once for one of the DV standards while I was still maintaining dvswitch, although I don't remember what I paid for it.
For ISO 4210-4:2023, e.g., you can go to https://www.iso.org/standard/78079.html and pay.
Yes, sometimes the price is prohibitively high though, especially if you need the whole standard on something.
@liw
ISO does just sell their standards. Everyone has access provided they open their wallet. I did that once for one of the DV standards while I was still maintaining dvswitch, although I don't remember what I paid for it.
For ISO 4210-4:2023, e.g., you can go to https://www.iso.org/standard/78079.html and pay.
Yes, sometimes the price is prohibitively high though, especially if you need the whole standard on something.
@liw
@bagder
The contact details are at the bottom of that first email, but it's video@fosdem.org plus a few other options.
Or you can dm me (does the fediverse support that? Not sure...🤷)
The contact details are at the bottom of that first email, but it's video@fosdem.org plus a few other options.
Or you can dm me (does the fediverse support that? Not sure...🤷)
@bagder
Thanks for calling my code fancy 😉
We can add an apology note if you like. They look like the second slide on https://GitHub.com/FOSDEM/video/issues/233
If you want to go down that route, contact us (contact info in the review invite emails) and we'll get that set up.
Thanks for calling my code fancy 😉
We can add an apology note if you like. They look like the second slide on https://GitHub.com/FOSDEM/video/issues/233
If you want to go down that route, contact us (contact info in the review invite emails) and we'll get that set up.
@SamCrawley
Some may say this has already happened. I mean, you get to choose between something superficially resembling a party with reasonable opinions and a bunch of lunatic crazies.
@thomasfuchs
Some may say this has already happened. I mean, you get to choose between something superficially resembling a party with reasonable opinions and a bunch of lunatic crazies.
@thomasfuchs
@z3ntu
Welcome! Glad to hear the efforts are appreciated 😁
And yes, I had to spend most of today trying to make everything work smoothly... 😳
Welcome! Glad to hear the efforts are appreciated 😁
And yes, I had to spend most of today trying to make everything work smoothly... 😳
Situation is somewhat better now, so if you had a talk at FOSDEM a few hours ago, you're very likely to have an email with a review invitation. Speakers, please check!
Cc @fosdem
Cc @fosdem
What happens if you forget to configure a time zone?
Jobs run incorrectly, and then you have to run them again... And then you get this.
😞
Jobs run incorrectly, and then you have to run them again... And then you get this.
😞
@georgetakei
Baseball players
- play with wood and balls all the time
- have gotten to fourth base with their team mates more than anyone else in the world.
Baseball players
- play with wood and balls all the time
- have gotten to fourth base with their team mates more than anyone else in the world.
Still don't understand why people send out 'I will redesign your website for you' spam to small open source projects or people running their own handcrafted website.
Like, read your audience?
Like, read your audience?
@dos
Obviously there's a limit to how far you can go with this, but then I'm not advocating a model that does not even partially map onto the way things really are.
Git's data model is awesome and great and can let you do massively impressive things, but I just want to write code, you know? And I'll fall back on it when my simple model doesn't work, but for day to day things? Nah, thanks.
@b0rk
Obviously there's a limit to how far you can go with this, but then I'm not advocating a model that does not even partially map onto the way things really are.
Git's data model is awesome and great and can let you do massively impressive things, but I just want to write code, you know? And I'll fall back on it when my simple model doesn't work, but for day to day things? Nah, thanks.
@b0rk
@dos
And that's fine.
What I'm saying is that I find it much easier to just Get Stuff Done if I use a mental model that is closer to how I work than it is to the actual implementation of things.
You seem to prefer the opposite.
None of this makes either you or me wrong, it just means we're different 🤷
@b0rk
And that's fine.
What I'm saying is that I find it much easier to just Get Stuff Done if I use a mental model that is closer to how I work than it is to the actual implementation of things.
You seem to prefer the opposite.
None of this makes either you or me wrong, it just means we're different 🤷
@b0rk
@dos
I'm very much aware, thanks for git 101 (which I'm not needing, thanks)
I think that how you think about your daily work is sometimes more important than how the software itself works. For git branches, this very much applies.
You seem to disagree, which is fine. But just because the way I usually think about things is different from how things really are, doesn't mean I don't know how things really work.
@b0rk
I'm very much aware, thanks for git 101 (which I'm not needing, thanks)
I think that how you think about your daily work is sometimes more important than how the software itself works. For git branches, this very much applies.
You seem to disagree, which is fine. But just because the way I usually think about things is different from how things really are, doesn't mean I don't know how things really work.
@b0rk
incomplete and there are edge cases where it will fall on its face.
When that happens, I'll remember how things work technically and resolve the situation.
But for everyday work? Nope, not happening.
And yes, I *also* have git repositories with multiple root commits. Doesn't change about how I think about branches.
@b0rk @dos
When that happens, I'll remember how things work technically and resolve the situation.
But for everyday work? Nope, not happening.
And yes, I *also* have git repositories with multiple root commits. Doesn't change about how I think about branches.
@b0rk @dos
@dos
Sigh.
The question is not 'how does git implement branches', it's 'how do you think of branches in git'
My answer is closest to option 1.
I know that's not how git works! But that's fine.
What you don't seem to understand is that it's perfectly possible to have a simplified mental model of how software works, which lets you get on with actual work, without getting confused when the model doesn't match reality, because you're aware that your mental model is @b0rk
Sigh.
The question is not 'how does git implement branches', it's 'how do you think of branches in git'
My answer is closest to option 1.
I know that's not how git works! But that's fine.
What you don't seem to understand is that it's perfectly possible to have a simplified mental model of how software works, which lets you get on with actual work, without getting confused when the model doesn't match reality, because you're aware that your mental model is @b0rk