@slomo
Linux kernel policy requires that. Allows reviewers to go in with an understanding that the quality might not be great, I think?
At the same time, Linux kernel also requires that you understand the patch you send. So I'm also not quite sure why that policy exists.
Linux kernel policy requires that. Allows reviewers to go in with an understanding that the quality might not be great, I think?
At the same time, Linux kernel also requires that you understand the patch you send. So I'm also not quite sure why that policy exists.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1
@slomo
Yeah, you'd think so. But I don't know if the kernel community would care much about 'science reasons', and also I thought the process document about assistant tools was talking a lot about maintainers time, but now that I review it I seem to have misremembered.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
Quite confused now 🤷
Yeah, you'd think so. But I don't know if the kernel community would care much about 'science reasons', and also I thought the process document about assistant tools was talking a lot about maintainers time, but now that I review it I seem to have misremembered.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
Quite confused now 🤷