When reading code snippets in academic papers, do you like any of: monospaced font? symbol substitution (e.g. -> becomes →; \a becomes λa); syntax highlighting via colour?
@goldmann Thanks for your feedback! funny you should mention LaTeX, that is relevant to why I asked :-)
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
@laxla so you like the symbols in say, your editor (wiht ligature-font) but not in a PDF, is that right? Thanks for your response!
Two examples. Exhibit A: formatted using Listings package; Exhibit B: formatted using "lhs2tex", without any option tweaks
I think I'd prefer B if it hadn't gone so heavy with italics. I might be able to turn that off.
I think I'd prefer B if it hadn't gone so heavy with italics. I might be able to turn that off.
@laxla ah I see. Yeah, in the LaTeX packages I am looking at, they put a lot of effort into vertical alignment issues
@laxla Code. This is a computing PhD thesis. Edit: but the preprocessor lhs2tex is using math-environments for the typesetted code, so there's some overlap here
this is copying the syntax highlighting decisions that my code editor is using, but now I'm wondering, more fundamentally, what do I want to emphasise or de-emphasise? what is important? aargh
@laxla Latex is a pretty natural choice for writing a PhD thesis. What would you suggest instead?
@rivets for alignment? or legibility? I've seen convincing arguments both for and against legibility of proportional versus monospaced text. Personally I'm not sure.
@laxla Thanks for your input. Most Markdown→PDF workflows round-trip via LaTeX (I'm pretty sure Pandoc does). And I'm not sure they do anything special wrt formatting code -- likely just monospace it. Alas it's too late in my write-up to rework the whole thing in Markdown (or anything else) now. FWIW I've been mostly happy with LaTeX.
@laxla thanks: I hadn't seen or tried "minted" from those answers, so I'll give it a look!