@neverpanic Good question! Absolutely zero clue. This is the standard RPM as shipped with RHEL9 (haven't tried on fedora or opensuse yet)
[wouter@rhel rpm-gpg]$ sudo rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-BEID-RELEASE
[wouter@rhel rpm-gpg]$ sudo rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-BEID-RELEASE-2025
fout: RPM-GPG-KEY-BEID-RELEASE-2025: key 1 import failed.
[wouter@rhel rpm-gpg]$ sudo rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-BEID-CONTINUOUS
The only differences are that -2025 is recent and ECDSA NIST P-384, the other two are over 10 years old and need to be rotated, and are RSA.
Does RPM not support ECDSA for code signatures? Or am I doing something wrong?
@evan
My eyes! Take take the DN away!
My eyes! Take take the DN away!
@xeraa
I don't know the man, but if you say so I'll take your word for it
I don't know the man, but if you say so I'll take your word for it
@fanf42
Source? I don't see any news updates related to that, but ICBW
Source? I don't see any news updates related to that, but ICBW
@CyrilBrulebois
Congrats! I co owned a business for 15 years, before moving across continents.
It's hard, it's stressful, but it's also rewarding if you can make it work. And boy do I miss being able to say "sorry, our company doesn't do that"!
@debamax
Congrats! I co owned a business for 15 years, before moving across continents.
It's hard, it's stressful, but it's also rewarding if you can make it work. And boy do I miss being able to say "sorry, our company doesn't do that"!
@debamax
@suihkulokki
Apparently there's a fix for that:
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/174676#discussioncomment-14520625
Apparently there's a fix for that:
https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/174676#discussioncomment-14520625
@babe
I don't have a cat, but here's Stormy waiting for me to throw her ball.
I don't have a cat, but here's Stormy waiting for me to throw her ball.
@xeraa
Can't help but feel that these bullet points were written by an LLM. The style matches, that's for sure.
Can't help but feel that these bullet points were written by an LLM. The style matches, that's for sure.
@futtta
Is daar geen ussd code voor?
Is daar geen ussd code voor?
@jmtd
ISO all the way. ANSI doesn't let me type HTML.
ISO all the way. ANSI doesn't let me type HTML.
@fazalmajid
Getting lawyerly is instant goodbye for me. Interacting with my open source project is a privilege, not a right. If you take up my time doing anything other than 'oh sorry' after I said that what you did is not welcome... Thanks but no thanks
@ariadne @androcat
Getting lawyerly is instant goodbye for me. Interacting with my open source project is a privilege, not a right. If you take up my time doing anything other than 'oh sorry' after I said that what you did is not welcome... Thanks but no thanks
@ariadne @androcat
@thattommyhall
Something as versatile as curl can never be "mostly done", there's always new protocols being added
@bagder
Something as versatile as curl can never be "mostly done", there's always new protocols being added
@bagder
@justin
Instead of all this awfulness, I could imagine an LLM being trained on the downloads from dumps.wikimedia.org and it then being released under a CC-SA license, for instance.
@paul @rl_dane @sotolf
Instead of all this awfulness, I could imagine an LLM being trained on the downloads from dumps.wikimedia.org and it then being released under a CC-SA license, for instance.
@paul @rl_dane @sotolf
@sotolf
Also, me saying that I can see use cases for LLMs does not equate me endorsing the way LLMs are built today. Plagiarism by LLMs, sites being overwhelmed by unethical bots, and more, are all real things that expose the awfulness of today's generative AI boom. But just saying 'all machine learning is bad because look at these bad things' is throwing out the baby with the bath water IMO.
@justin @paul @rl_dane
Also, me saying that I can see use cases for LLMs does not equate me endorsing the way LLMs are built today. Plagiarism by LLMs, sites being overwhelmed by unethical bots, and more, are all real things that expose the awfulness of today's generative AI boom. But just saying 'all machine learning is bad because look at these bad things' is throwing out the baby with the bath water IMO.
@justin @paul @rl_dane
@sotolf
No. The use case I gave was 'allow a hooman to query and command the computer in natural language'. I then gave 2 examples, one being home automation. It's not even the best one.
I have email going back several decades. I would like to have a locally-running LLM go over that archive and help me find that one conversation that I vaguely remember from years ago without remembering details.
@paul @rl_dane @justin
No. The use case I gave was 'allow a hooman to query and command the computer in natural language'. I then gave 2 examples, one being home automation. It's not even the best one.
I have email going back several decades. I would like to have a locally-running LLM go over that archive and help me find that one conversation that I vaguely remember from years ago without remembering details.
@paul @rl_dane @justin
A tool to interpret the spoken sentence "please give me light, I can't see" as a command to turn on the lights in the room? Yes, good idea (home assistant can do this).
Using generative AI to generate answers to questions is almost always wrong. But I do see some valid use cases...
@sotolf @justin @rl_dane @paul
Using generative AI to generate answers to questions is almost always wrong. But I do see some valid use cases...
@sotolf @justin @rl_dane @paul
@paul
LLMs have the potential to be useful. Any place where a computer needs to understand a human query and do something with that query other than generating an answer, is a place where I can see LLMs as a useful tool.
A tool that links to what it thinks as the correct answer in pre-existing documentation? Awesome (my bank does this, looping the conversation to a human if the answer was declared not helpful)
@sotolf @justin @rl_dane
LLMs have the potential to be useful. Any place where a computer needs to understand a human query and do something with that query other than generating an answer, is a place where I can see LLMs as a useful tool.
A tool that links to what it thinks as the correct answer in pre-existing documentation? Awesome (my bank does this, looping the conversation to a human if the answer was declared not helpful)
@sotolf @justin @rl_dane
help wanted, quiet place to stay for a bit
@joepie91
Yeah. They're good value for money but they're definitely not in the lower price range, that's true.
Don't have another option I can think of then, I'm afraid. Good luck with the search!
Yeah. They're good value for money but they're definitely not in the lower price range, that's true.
Don't have another option I can think of then, I'm afraid. Good luck with the search!