@Walop
Welcome to the world of conflicting bureaucratic requirements. When I did paperwork to move to South Africa, the South African government wanted me to do something (produce a certified copy of my passport) that the Belgian government declared illegal (you're not allowed to make any copies of any identity documents, not even your own)
The solution was to get a lawyer to help me find my way out. I'd suggest you might need to do the same.
Welcome to the world of conflicting bureaucratic requirements. When I did paperwork to move to South Africa, the South African government wanted me to do something (produce a certified copy of my passport) that the Belgian government declared illegal (you're not allowed to make any copies of any identity documents, not even your own)
The solution was to get a lawyer to help me find my way out. I'd suggest you might need to do the same.
@sj
Not a very cryptographically strong semiprime though
Not a very cryptographically strong semiprime though
@pixx
Okay, yes. To me, open core is not open source, and a company dropping a free 'community version' but not taking patches for that one nor even providing a basic version of support might as well just do shareware instead.
Okay, yes. To me, open core is not open source, and a company dropping a free 'community version' but not taking patches for that one nor even providing a basic version of support might as well just do shareware instead.
@pixx
I don't think the expectation of free support is valid. If someone asks for support on a public forum, I help them if and when I have time or let someone else handle it when not. If someone sends me private email, I send information on the public forum as well as a quote for paid private support.
Nobody should feel forced to do anything just because they happen to do open source.
I don't think the expectation of free support is valid. If someone asks for support on a public forum, I help them if and when I have time or let someone else handle it when not. If someone sends me private email, I send information on the public forum as well as a quote for paid private support.
Nobody should feel forced to do anything just because they happen to do open source.
@pixx
Copying software costs nothing. Yes, writing software does. But to charge 100s of $CURRENCY for something you copy millions of times? Yuck.
I mean it's not a coincidence that most of today's billionaires made their money doing software.
@amin @rl_dane @ivanmarkov @clayton @orbitalmartian @kabel42
Copying software costs nothing. Yes, writing software does. But to charge 100s of $CURRENCY for something you copy millions of times? Yuck.
I mean it's not a coincidence that most of today's billionaires made their money doing software.
@amin @rl_dane @ivanmarkov @clayton @orbitalmartian @kabel42
@sean
Vaccines work *because* they don't kill you, and therefore make you stronger...?
Vaccines work *because* they don't kill you, and therefore make you stronger...?
It was pointed out to me that this post is now quoted on their website, and misinterpreted at that. Roy, since I know you're following this thread: No, I did not say that you deserve to be harassed. Nobody does. When I said "you deserved it", that referred to your continued false accusations in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Also, sorry to spoil your thunder, but quoting Daniel Pocock is not the flex you think it is.
@rnd
You are not wrong. Part of this is because Keith Packard spent a few years at Intel teaching corporate structures how you upstream a driver for Linux into X11 (at the time) and Mesa:
https://keithp.com/keithp/resume/
@ariadne @agowa338
You are not wrong. Part of this is because Keith Packard spent a few years at Intel teaching corporate structures how you upstream a driver for Linux into X11 (at the time) and Mesa:
https://keithp.com/keithp/resume/
@ariadne @agowa338
The internet was not a mistake
Social media was not a mistake
Allowing Corporations to dictate and control both of these things was the mistake.
@liw
They did? Whoa. I must've missed that bit. Damn.
They did? Whoa. I must've missed that bit. Damn.
@liw
(It's called 'AIStor' these days, presumably to be buzzword compatible ๐ but it's really an S3 thing, SDK at https://www.min.io/download/aistor-sdk
(It's called 'AIStor' these days, presumably to be buzzword compatible ๐ but it's really an S3 thing, SDK at https://www.min.io/download/aistor-sdk
@navi
I mean yes if you're going to be serious about building a binary repository then higher-level tools like reprepro to track packages and their versions in different suites so that you get auto cleanup of old versions and easy metadata signatures are definitely useful, but they're absolutely not required.
@SRAZKVT @dalias @draeath @ska
I mean yes if you're going to be serious about building a binary repository then higher-level tools like reprepro to track packages and their versions in different suites so that you get auto cleanup of old versions and easy metadata signatures are definitely useful, but they're absolutely not required.
@SRAZKVT @dalias @draeath @ska
@navi
A deb/rpm repository isn't much more than that. You dump packages in a directory and run a single command to extract the metadata into an index file. 'createrepo' or its C reimplementation for rpm, 'dpkg-scanpackages' for deb. That's all that's *required*. You then export said directory over http or mount it and you can install these packages with all the dependency tracking.
@dalias @draeath @ska @SRAZKVT
A deb/rpm repository isn't much more than that. You dump packages in a directory and run a single command to extract the metadata into an index file. 'createrepo' or its C reimplementation for rpm, 'dpkg-scanpackages' for deb. That's all that's *required*. You then export said directory over http or mount it and you can install these packages with all the dependency tracking.
@dalias @draeath @ska @SRAZKVT